1947 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Jeep CJ2A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1947 Jeep CJ2A should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1947 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1947 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1947 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1947 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Jeep CJ2A | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | CJ2A | 66 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
