1947 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2005 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mariner (153 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 436 kg more than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mariner (206 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Jeep CJ2A | 2005 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | CJ2A | Mariner |
Year Released | 1947 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1546 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |