1947 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2011 BMW 320
To start off, 2011 BMW 320 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 320 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1947 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1947 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1947 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Jeep CJ2A | 2011 BMW 320 | |
| Make | Jeep | BMW |
| Model | CJ2A | 320 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4624 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2810 mm |
