1947 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1947 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 881 kg more than 1947 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Maserati A6G | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Maserati | Cadillac |
Model | A6G | CTS |
Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1756 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |