1947 Peugeot 202 vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Volvo 240 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1947 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1947 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1947 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Peugeot 202 | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 202 | 240 |
Year Released | 1947 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1132 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2650 mm |