1947 Riley RM A vs. 2004 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2004 Toyota Solara is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Solara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Solara weights approximately 160 kg more than 1947 Riley RM A.
Because 1947 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Solara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Riley RM A | 2004 Toyota Solara | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Solara |
Year Released | 1947 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |