1947 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Outback weights approximately 275 kg more than 1947 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Riley RM A | 2005 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Riley | Subaru |
| Model | RM A | Outback |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |
