1947 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1947 Riley RM A.
Because 1947 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1947 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1947 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Riley RM A | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Riley | Ford |
| Model | RM A | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4717 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2824 mm |
