1947 Volvo PV 60 vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass (164 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 1947 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1947 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1947 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: