1948 AC 2-Litre vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1948 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1948 AC 2-Litre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 AC 2-Litre. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1948 AC 2-Litre | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | 2-Litre | Camaro |
Year Released | 1948 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2580 mm |