1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | 220 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 48 L |