1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1954 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 178 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 96.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |
