1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1962 DKW Munga is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 390 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | DKW |
| Model | 6C | Munga |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 68 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 31 L |
