1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 590 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1964 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1948 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |