1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1973 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1973 Toyota Corona is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1973 Toyota Corona. (83 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1973 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 595 kg more than 1973 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1973 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | Corona |
Year Released | 1948 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 51 L |