1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 590 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | 6C | Colt |
Year Released | 1948 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2310 mm |