1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Audi 100
To start off, 1981 Audi 100 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1981 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 390 kg more than 1981 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Audi 100 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
Model | 6C | 100 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |