1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Lancia A 112
To start off, 1981 Lancia A 112 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 715 kg more than 1981 Lancia A 112.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Lancia A 112 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
| Model | 6C | A 112 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 903 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2040 mm |
