1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1989 ZIL 4104 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 ZIL 4104 has automatic transmission and 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 ZIL 4104 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | ZIL |
| Model | 6C | 4104 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 312 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 104.9 mm |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 199 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3890 mm |
