1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1990 Rover Metro
To start off, 1990 Rover Metro is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Rover Metro (95 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Rover Metro should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 485 kg more than 1990 Rover Metro.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Rover Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1990 Rover Metro | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Rover |
Model | 6C | Metro |
Year Released | 1948 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2280 mm |