1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1992 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | XJS |
Year Released | 1948 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 82 L |