1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 154 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Camaro |
Year Released | 1948 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2690 mm |