1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2001 BMW Z3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 95 kg more than 2001 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | 6C | Z3 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 89.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 51 L |