1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 98 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Cavalier |
Year Released | 1948 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2650 mm |