1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2002 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2002 Mazda B2500 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2002 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2002 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2990 mm |
