1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 6C | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3060 mm |
