1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (157 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 310 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | Roadster |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2370 mm |