1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (108 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 5 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | Condor |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |