1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 188 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
Model | 6C | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1948 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 282 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2890 mm |