1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
Model | 6C | 9000 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |