1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (145 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Chrysler Voyager | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 6C | Voyager |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3050 mm |
