1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Jaguar XKR
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XKR is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XKR (390 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 348 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Jaguar XKR | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | XKR |
Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |