1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 6C | Colt |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 95 L |
