1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1347 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
Model | 6C | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1948 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3628 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2717 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2890 mm |