1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 905 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
| Model | 6C | Livina |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1598 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 52 L |
