1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Rover |
Model | 6C | 75 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |