1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Stilo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 235 kg more than 2009 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 6C | Stilo |
Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 58 L |