1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | F-450 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 326 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 6670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 4390 mm |
