1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 336 kg more than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 6C | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1948 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1826 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2423 mm |