1948 Allard K1 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 85 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 223 kg more than 1948 Allard K1.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Allard K1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Allard K1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1948 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Allard K1 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Allard | Jeep |
Model | K1 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |