1948 Allard K1 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1948 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1948 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Allard K1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1948 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Allard K1 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K1 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |