1948 Allard K1 vs. 2000 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2000 Westfield ZEI is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Westfield ZEI (129 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1948 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1948 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Allard K1 weights approximately 347 kg more than 2000 Westfield ZEI.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Allard K1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Westfield ZEI. (162 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1948 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Westfield ZEI.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Allard K1 | 2000 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Allard | Westfield |
Model | K1 | ZEI |
Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2340 mm |