1948 Allard K1 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Allard K1 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1948 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Allard K1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Allard K1 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K1 | CTS |
Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 64 L |