1948 Allard K1 vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Allard K1 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1948 Allard K1. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1948 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Allard K1. (203 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Allard K1 | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K1 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |