1948 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Alvis TA 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1948 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alvis TA 14 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1948 Alvis TA 14 has manual transmission. 1948 Alvis TA 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alvis TA 14 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TA 14 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |