1948 Alvis TB 14 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Cadillac 62 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1948 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1948 Alvis TB 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alvis TB 14 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
| Model | TB 14 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3300 mm |
