1948 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Alvis TB 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1948 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1948 Alvis TB 14.
Because 1948 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Alvis TB 14 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Alvis | Nissan |
| Model | TB 14 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2360 mm |
