1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1951 Jeep CJ3A is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre (76 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre weights approximately 10 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Jeep |
| Model | 2-Litre | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |
