1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre (76 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre weights approximately 390 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Aston Martin | MCC |
Model | 2-Litre | Smart |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |