1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 567 kg more than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Lincoln |
| Model | 2-Litre | LS |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 232 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3020 mm |
